Earth’s population is up against a vicious plague that’s transforming everyone into vampires and draining the world of an increasingly precious resource: blood. Edward Dalton (Ethan Hawke) and “Elvis” Cormac (Willem Dafoe) must decide what happens next. As the human race count nears zero, will vampires feast on the few men and women who remain, or could science hold the key to a less destructive solution? Sam Neill and Claudia Karvan co-star.

Shawn – TV-Tastic
Rating: 6 out of 10

The immediate gut-reaction for a film like “Daybreakers” is: “Oh, great… yet another vampire film, because that genre hasn’t been exploited enough over the past five years.” To be honest, that was my reaction when I first saw trailers for this in late 2009. The problem for Daybreakers, and most likely the reason for its miserable box-office numbers of $51 million total gross, is the producers marketed the film in some misguided attempt to hop on the bandwagon of other popular vampire franchises, such as “Twilight,” “True Blood,” and “The Vampire Diaries.” That was a very bad marketing decision.

Daybreakers is a very original and unique twist on the vampire genre in that it’s not really a horror film at all. It’s a classic science-fiction story that deals with science as a backdrop and asks many “what if” and “how would you react” questions about exploiting others for your own immortality. How does a society preserve its humanity when mortality has been taken away? As far as vampire films go, there is surprisingly little graphic violence until the very end of the film because, frankly, it’s really not necessary to progress the story.

Where the film ultimately suffers is that it is very short, with a running time of 97 minutes. For a science fiction story with such an original concept there is far too little exposition. It leaves a lot of questions unanswered and is so quick that the audience doesn’t really have an opportunity to become emotionally attached to the characters or the plot. The performances from DaFoe, Hawke, and the rest of the cast are fine but you really don’t have any sense of a vested interest in any of these characters. If the audience can’t relate to the characters, they have no reason to care about the story.

Daybreakers, albeit not the best film, is enjoyable and worth your time if you like a unique sci-fi story. Netflix subscribers can watch it as part of their subscription through the Netflix streaming service.

10 responses to “Daybreakers

  1. I just saw this movie the other day. I thought I wrote a review too but wasn’t sure. Anyway, I thought it was a wasted premise. The idea that vampires would outnumber humans has been something I always thought should have been explored within the mythology but this film really fucked it up. It’s like being handed a recipe for steak and making spam burgers. Once you get past the intitial good idea it turnes intop a lame monster movie with an excessive amount of blue lighting and bad acting, particularly from the remaining humans who have decided to band together with crossbows and take on the world! Lame!

    Either way, it was a well written review Shawn. 🙂

    • Thanks, Bri. I think you and I are pretty much on the same page with this movie. I just gave a little more of a pass on some of the issues than you did. You’re absolutely correct about the premise. It was a great idea that they turned into Spam burgers.

  2. Shawn has a taste in movies all his own. I still love him, though. You have to take into account that he said A-Team was more enjoyable than Black Swan.

    • That’s because it is. Not a single angst-ridden whiny bitch with a French dance instructor’s entire forearm up her cooch during the whole film. Now, I will grant you that having Jessica Biel in any film is almost as bad but still, I’m far more entertained by generic storylines, ‘splosions and guys who can’t pull off American accents than I am by pretentious scripts, overrated performances and plots so predictable that I had the whole story figured based on the trailer. At least during The A-Team, I wasn’t looking at my watch every five minutes. Again, this doesn’t mean that I thought it was better than Black Swan,/em>, but was it more enjoyable? Oh, God, yes.

  3. I would consider having a limb amputated more enjoyable than the A-Team.

  4. I’m intrigued by this as it sounds more of a sci-fi than a full-on vampire horror flick. I guess the premise is what intrigues me most, I hope the way it’s presented is decent given the pretty strong cast.

  5. I’ll check this out eventually, that’s the category it falls into. I’d like to see The Movie Bros do a post about the Top 5 Vampire movies, that’d be keen.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s